Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mattdesl pfp
mattdesl
@mattdesl
so much euphoria on FC timeline about degen. πŸ«₯ it’s a memecoin with questionable allocation, centralized operation, and appears to be mostly closed-source. do you really think this is a sustainable future for FC and decentralized social media protocols?
19 replies
2 recasts
51 reactions

Paul Duca πŸ“š pfp
Paul Duca πŸ“š
@paulduca
Feel like you should provide evidence with statements of that magnitude. But it’s important to be critical and ask questions of the platform and not just go full Heavens Gate because people are taking home bags.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mattdesl pfp
mattdesl
@mattdesl
is it really that hard to verify my statements? 1) highly allocated toward the devs, initial investors, early FC power casters 2) clearly centrally operated 3) open source and decentralization do not seem to be core tenants
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Paul Duca πŸ“š pfp
Paul Duca πŸ“š
@paulduca
For both 1 and 2 these feel like it’s often the case when a project begins 1) what is the allocation splits? What percentage of wallets hold. 2) for now, but with strong community this might not always be the case 3) agree, but could change
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
Burden of proof and all that, but sure, I'll bite. 1) unapologetically true, all on chain with summaries on the website 2) DEGEN POINTS are totally off-chain, yup, and the rest is at @jacek's discretion until finished 3)Eh, nah, too broad an allegation, especially if it follows from (2). Also demonstrably false.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction