Georgian land tax premise:

Let’s say:
- You own a piece of land in a city
- You don’t build anything on it, just wait for prices to go up
- Ten years later, the neighborhood is booming—thanks to new subway lines, stores, schools
- Now your land is worth 10x more, even though you didn’t do anything

Georgism says you shouldn’t get to keep all of that profit—it was created by everyone else. So a land value tax would make sure you pay some of that value back into the community.

Urbanist thinking about open places, open access, and open web
/urbanism + https://zora.co/@miawintam

Interesting way of looking at property appreciation for sure. But I think it might open Pandora's box of issues if anyone puts "some sort of investment" into that empty plot. 

Now you have to find a way of 
- quantifying effort and investment IN a single plot 
- value a community gets OUT of the plot 
- an index that enables comparison of these two factors over wide areas, different zoning types, construction types
- scaling it for an entire neighborhood/jurisdiction

Marketer @Breadchain, creator of Is This The New Internet? Podcast, /newinternetpod 
https://www.marvynpaul.com/subscribe
https://linktr.ee/marvynpaul

Yep good points. I think that could be the next step though, finding ways to apply “sense making tools” (lol) to better measure and quantify the wide range/ scale of different plots. Land is incredibly complex and we need more nuanced ways to account for their value (environmental, social, inter-generational)