Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
The risk of politician coins comes from the fact that they are such a perfect bribery vehicle. If a politician issues a coin, you do not even need to send *them* any coins to give them money. Instead, you just buy and hold the coin, and this increases the value of their holdings passively. Furthermore, there is deniability: holding the coin is, in financial effect, a linear combination of donating to the issuer and gambling. Hence you can intend to do the former but when challenged claim that you are doing the latter. You can even hold the coin privately, and show that you are holding it to whoever; you do not need any zero knowledge proofs, you just send a test transaction. This is all risky to democracy, for reasons similar to what I wrote in https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/08/16/voting3.html and elsewhere. TLDR: the economic arguments for why markets are so great for "regular" goods and services do not extend to "markets for political influence". I recommend politicians do not go down this path.
16 replies
44 recasts
214 reactions
Chinmay đšī¸đŋ
@chinmay.eth
Are you suggesting that all politicians are banned from launching memecoins? If so, how about lobbyists or news reporters? Where do we draw the line?
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
marv đī¸
@marvp
The same people loudly declaring Pelosi is abusing her office for insider trading (despite her barely cracking the top 5 in gains through stock trades) are now praising a president launching a meme coin where he holds 80% of the supply. The hypocrisy is painful
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chinmay đšī¸đŋ
@chinmay.eth
I don't even think that's hypocrisy. These people just don't know the difference.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
