Martin K

@martinkrung

81 Following

87 Followers

Martin K pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

https://x.com/CurveCap/status/1841092830997200918

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Blinky Stitt pfp

@flashprofits.eth

They posted a vote for DAO revenue transition from 3crv to crvUSD https://crvhub.com/governance/ownership/754

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

Martin K pfp

Ded, but the sun is raising fast.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

Thanks, it's a first step. 11 $degen

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

bad at seeing the future, like all of us. and he does not need a career, because he has curve.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

how does tipping work? I there I guide somewhere? It's not sent automaticly? It's so meta, its hard to search for. 11 $degen

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

I don't get how this works, should it not autosend some 55 degen to you? or at least request this to send? can you explain? (I have degen)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Martin K pfp

Markets go up, markets go down, but the bank always wins. 1'071% liquidity utilization on the renzo drama!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

The benefit of soft-liquidation for users allows us to set conservative LTV values, because we don't compete to be the most capital efficient markets, but compensate users with the benefits of soft-liquidation which helps save their position in rough markets.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

What out of questions: Aave and Morpho are both highly professional teams, Aave is battle tested over more than one cycle, while Morpho and risk managers on Morpho are still in the learning phase. Curve has a lending market too, but Curve has always chosen the path to try to solve issues with technical solutions.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

Does it scale? It may scale better than Aave, but has reputation risk for Morpho, even if they are not risk manager. And: In an easy markets, users may flock to the risk manager who takes more risk, the same risk manager who are whipped out if the markets are in turmoil.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

where the risk managers use the infrastructure, but any hiccups do not affect the Morpho brand. Now Morphos brand suffers from spill over of quality issues from one of the risk managers.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

Risk managers can be specialized in markets and if you know markets well, you can choose more risky parameters for your markets, which makes it more capital efficient. The pure Morpho way, would be that they only manage the protocol, maybe with a costume white label front end,

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

Having risk parameters on the safe side also lowers the capital efficiency. Morpho has dedicated, independent risk managers, which manage metamorpho vault and and create or attached markets to it, if it fits their risk profile.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

Does it scale? It has limits, as many different assets, crypto native and non crypto native ones come into existence. It's a jungle, and how should one entity have deep expertise about all assets? Aave chose their risk parameters always on the safe side, and if they don't have the expertise, they don't list assets.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

Aave/Morpho A clash of different worldviews. Both design have their pros and cons. Aave as an entity manages all the risk and also covers any loss. Aave needs deep expertise on all coins and the dynamic of their corresponding markets. You trust the brand, Aave, and they did a very good job of shielding users from risk.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Martin K pfp

https://crvusd.curve.fi/#/ethereum/markets

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Alddin DAO pfp

GM We made it to Farcaster! 🙌

0 reply

4 recasts

3 reactions