Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
starting to realize most of the breakout coins on base might be new infrastructure coins degen led here, and now virtuals and clanker have preivously been bearish on infra/utility type stuff but re-assessing
2 replies
1 recast
30 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Degen had some utility to give it value, does clanker have anything to give it utility aside from being associated to the narrative/meme of clanker coins this cycle? If no utility I struggle to understand how anything survives once the narrative does down and people move on to the next casino It’s what happened to 99.9% of alts in the ico mania
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
Yeah most of my thinking is in the next 6 months or so - almost no tokens have shown they can survive a market and come back better the next time around, so that's not my plan. I think Degen had utility but almost all of the value / speculation had very little to do with the utility and more with making more money. Elaborate ponzi (in a good way) in that sense. Clanker has no utility, I don't think stuff like Virtuals does either. But the speculation can go longer than people think
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
Anecdotally was able to track down an onchain wallet tied to a VC firm buying like $800k of clanker which prompted some of these thoughts
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction