markus - ethOS - e/acc-d pfp
markus - ethOS - e/acc-d
@markus
What the fuck is wrong with Ledger
8 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

EV3 Sal pfp
EV3 Sal
@danconia-crypto
isn’t this basically fireblocks-for-retail? tbh i don’t get the backlash… not like they made it opt-out
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

markus - ethOS - e/acc-d pfp
markus - ethOS - e/acc-d
@markus
No. With this feature they confirmed that they (Ledger Company) can push firmware updates that mess with the seed phrase. This should not be possible under any circumstance
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Hmm, I think if you want that level of control don’t use a hardware wallet built by someone else? Order of magnitude more cases of people losing phrases
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

markus - ethOS - e/acc-d pfp
markus - ethOS - e/acc-d
@markus
If you're buying a "hardware" wallet, the assumption is already that the manufacturer and hackers cannot extract the seed phrase. And "Just DIY it" is something you can tell someone with years of computer science/cybersecurity experience, but not the average crypto user.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Right, what I’m saying is the avg crypto user is an order of magnitude more likely to lose the phrase than be hacked / nation state compelling Ledger to back door. If you want maximum security, don’t use a company.
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

markus - ethOS - e/acc-d pfp
markus - ethOS - e/acc-d
@markus
Losing your seed phrase being more common is your opinion. Fact is, nation states and companies should not be able to do this. My take is that the average user still deserves maximum security.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction