Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
my two cents and in-good-faith interpretation of "not enough interesting content": @dwr.eth DOES NOT mean that current users aren't interesting enough @dwr.eth DOES mean that there are not enough of us so that the supply of interesting content on warpcast simply cannot compete with the supply on other platforms
36 replies
207 recasts
655 reactions
Maretus
@maretus
I think content is the secondary reason people come here. I don’t come here for content. I come here for people. Warpcast should be focusing more on social networking and less on social media imo. I don’t go to Facebook for content either. But I still use it everyday.
2 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
christin
@christin
I agree, it is tricky bc a) content creators need an audience to perform for, and b) the audience (who are not content creators and are here to vibe) are placed in hidden replies which make for a poor onboarding experience what if users can self-tag what their goals are (content creating vs vibing) and be judged on different algos? this can separate social media vs social network intents and allow for differentiated experiences that serve both camps.
4 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Maretus
@maretus
Sounds like it might be worth exploring. I don’t remember the statistic but a vast majority of Twitter users are just lurkers don’t actually comment. I don’t think we have the same thing happening here. Maybe because it’s more about the connection here and less about the consumption of content. At least in my experience.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
it’s the power rule / law: 1% original posters 9% replies 90% lurkers i’ve written about this in the past
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
