Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Channels update 1. It was a big change, but overall I think sentiment is net positive across a good chunk of the network 2. The most common frustrations: a. losing access to a favorite channel, esp. if you had a streak in it b. seeing your reply "below the fold" c. older casts in channels disappearing from personal profiles d. many channels not having clear instructions for joining So what we're doing this week 3. Continue to talk to users (mostly me) and pay attention to feedback 4. We're considering some tweaks to how above / below the fold works for non-members, esp. if the original caster is following someone. We won't make any sudden changes here, fwiw 5. Strongly considering adding back older casts in channels to profiles (with a label on the cast). The data is untouched at the protocol level, just hidden on Warpcast right now. 6. Continue to get feedback from channel owners / mods / users / developers on making request to join a channel a primitive similar to invites. Again, no sudden changes.
43 replies
94 recasts
240 reactions

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus.eth
Can we please prioritize showing engagement on casts for all members? Not hiding engagement for people with spam labels or however itโ€™s done. Invited channel members should have their engagement shown to other members.
4 replies
0 recast
14 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Making sure I understand: you're referring to reply and like counts on casts in the feed? You're seeing the actual replies from members above the fold?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

arob.base.eth๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽฉ pfp
arob.base.eth๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽฉ
@arob1000
Great suggestion. Seconded.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

 โ“‚๏ธOODY๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ– pfp
โ“‚๏ธOODY๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ–
@moody1899
+1๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tknox.eth๐ŸŸช๐ŸŽฉ pfp
tknox.eth๐ŸŸช๐ŸŽฉ
@thompson
i agree with this โ€” i donโ€™t think we should be discounting people โ€” especially people in channels
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction