Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus.eth
I have heard from a few people who are concerned about the reducing Moxie emissions, so I wanted to share my take. Reducing emissions is an absolutely necessary and healthy activity—especially when it’s managed carefully. Back in April, when DEGEN was on the moon, emissions were drastically cut compared to prior seasons. This move dampened enthusiasm for the project and Warpcast in general. If emissions had been managed more strategically, who knows how it might have impacted DAU and price? Watching the Airstack team handle emissions with precision is bullish AF. They’re setting things up for long-term /success.
74 replies
22 recasts
86 reactions

nuel. pfp
nuel.
@nuelprime
wasn’t this too.. drastic ?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus.eth
Which part? The cut to multipliers or the reduction of organic farscores? New farscores is super healthy imo. They cut emissions from a lot of people who aren’t participating in the project.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

nuel. pfp
nuel.
@nuelprime
the idea is healthy i’m just seeing from a view that this was caused by unusual or unforeseen activities by some users
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus.eth
Yea, I think that could definitely be part of it. More “farming” than anticipated. But the solutions seem even keeled so far. In April when this happened with Degen, we went from like 1B in emissions/month to 150m. Like a 600% reduction.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nuel. pfp
nuel.
@nuelprime
yeah.. airstack learnt from their mistake xD
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction