Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Maretus
@maretus.eth
I have heard from a few people who are concerned about the reducing Moxie emissions, so I wanted to share my take. Reducing emissions is an absolutely necessary and healthy activity—especially when it’s managed carefully. Back in April, when DEGEN was on the moon, emissions were drastically cut compared to prior seasons. This move dampened enthusiasm for the project and Warpcast in general. If emissions had been managed more strategically, who knows how it might have impacted DAU and price? Watching the Airstack team handle emissions with precision is bullish AF. They’re setting things up for long-term /success.
74 replies
22 recasts
86 reactions
Jarrett
@jarrettr
They’ve reduced emissions TWICE for everyone because boosted accounts max out their daily interactions for clout and replyke farm It literally wasn’t an issue
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Maretus
@maretus.eth
Reducing emissions has literally always been in the plans though. Their docs are very clear. Emissions reductions are going to continue happening. I’d rather them be this thoughtful than the alternative.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jarrett
@jarrettr
If they had done it in the way it was planned I wouldn’t have an issue with it. The only reason they nerfed emissions is to get them back to the level they were pre boosting (target is 5-10 mil/day iirc?) I also don’t get how heavily reducing emissions twice without addressing the main issue that was causing them to skyrocket is thoughtful at all 😅
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
