my two cents and in-good-faith interpretation of "not enough interesting content":

@dwr.eth DOES NOT mean that current users aren't interesting enough

@dwr.eth DOES mean that there are not enough of us so that the supply of interesting content on warpcast simply cannot compete with the supply on other platforms

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

I think content is the secondary reason people come here.

I don’t come here for content. I come here for people.

Warpcast should be focusing more on social networking and less on social media imo.

I don’t go to Facebook for content either. But I still use it everyday.

Founder of the /success channel. Search Marketing Director at Kraken Kratom. 

neuroscience PhD, healthcare marketer, interfaith chaplain. vibe imagineer for /christin, co-host of the /okbanger show
seemore.tv/christin

Sounds like it might be worth exploring. 

I don’t remember the statistic but a vast majority of Twitter users are just lurkers don’t actually comment. I don’t think we have the same thing happening here. Maybe because it’s more about the connection here and less about the consumption of content. At least in my experience.

I agree, it is tricky bc 

a) content creators need an audience to perform for, and

b) the audience (who are not content creators and are here to vibe) are placed in hidden replies which make for a poor onboarding experience 

what if users can self-tag what their goals are (content creating vs vibing) and be judged on different algos? this can separate social media vs social network intents and allow for differentiated experiences that serve both camps.

I listened to it and do like that channels are being focused on for sure.

A little nervous about the impact it will have on new channels and creators cause it will no doubt impact content viability for some.

i think they may agree which is why they’re doubling down on channel as cozy corners and investing resources into it (per the most recent dev call)