founders-club

Talent Protocol aggregates data from GitHub, onchain activity, and other platforms to create your Builder Score. Given that you've recently launched Builder Score V2 in February, what key improvements have you made? Looking forward, will you focus more on building new features or expanding data sources? 

By the way, the current design appears quite robust against manipulation, as scores are grounded in verified identities and genuine proofs of work. Could you also share your insights on how the system maintains its resilience against attempts to game the scores? @macedo 

关于 Talent Protocol 的声誉系统，我觉得你们把 Builder Score 的设计做得非常扎实，用 GitHub、链上活动等等真实数据作为依据，感觉很难有人能够“刷分”或“投机取巧”。我也注意到你们在今年 2 月发布了 Builder Score V2，想问一下，这次的升级主要在哪些方面做了优化和提升呢？

接下来你们的产品侧重点是什么？是会更专注于开发新的功能...

another great question @julieinweb3 

The Builder Score V2 upgrade in February brought several key improvements:

1. More accurate scoring: We redesigned the scoring system to make it more precise and harder to game, with better signals for distinguishing real builders.

2. Transparent calculation: We separated objective data (Data Points) from subjective scoring (Scoring Systems), making the entire process more understandable.

3. Historical tracking: We introduced an event-based system that tracks reputation changes over time, similar to how Etherscan tracks transactions.

Looking ahead, we're focusing on both new features and expanded data sources:

- For features, we're prioritizing Builder Index (our search engine for finding builders) and improving API access for developers.

- For data points, we're expanding beyond just developer metrics to include other builder types, starting with Creators still this year.

Regarding anti-gaming measures, our system's resilience comes from:
- Only using verified connections ...

↑ community first | enjoy the moment | building decentralized social @tako | building /thebasics /00s /zhongwenjiao /spacem3lon /base-hk