Mac Budkowski ᵏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
the unspoken part here is: we don't have infinite devs, attention and capital. if devs work on pump dot fun, they don't work on polymarket. if attention is moved to memecoins, it's taken away from quality projects. if vcs pump speculation-centric apps, they don't fund value generation-centric apps.
4 replies
2 recasts
14 reactions

Mac Budkowski ᵏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
and yeah, sure pump dot fun might lead to some innovation. but what are the chances that if we put all these devs, attention and money into other project, it'd produce more innovation and less collateral damage?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mac Budkowski ᵏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
what's more, speculation-first products create a vicious circle that are hard to break (linkrel) https://kanfa.macbudkowski.com/speculation-market-fit-trap
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Vivacious 🎩💎 pfp
Vivacious 🎩💎
@vivacious
✍️✍️✍️
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Juliettemeon 🎩 pfp
Juliettemeon 🎩
@juliettemeon.eth
Your point makes sense in terms of resource allocation, but from a marketing and crypto reality perspective, it’s not that black and white. Projects like pump.fun, while they may seem silly, often attract attention, onboard new users, and even spark unexpected innovation. Not all devs are driven by long term value creation, and attention isn’t always a zero sum game , sometimes it grows rather than just shifts !
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction