Tabletop

Who is more inherently dangerous to encounter on the road

Lawful Good who’s taught a ruthless moral framework from birth

or a Chaotic Neutral 

(assume similar stats)

weird internet kid. helping Creators with /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /cameron + pdfproject.org | dev + veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

in DnD? chaotic neutral > lawful good (more entertaining)
in real life? chaotic neutral >>> lawful good (no explicit, cosmically absolute good, just local interpretations)

𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖙𝖚𝖒 𝖆𝖉 𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖗𝖆

🎯

moral absolutism vs relativism is a controversial, pathos-heavy discussion.
the tl;dr is that most people expect to be surrounded by "good people", not in the agoraphilic sense of meeting any kind of "lawful good" and also rolling the dice on the flavor of morality.

I get the first bit, but can you say more about second bit?

That makes me think that lawful good is more dangerous BECAUSE there is no explicit good and they’re operating as if there is)