Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
JD Vance is a Ukraine-skeptic in the sense of opposing the prosecution of the war as presently conducted and with current goals; but he has also said recently that it would be against America’s interest if Russia were to march on Kyiv or a similarly extreme outcome. So in a different framing one can say that he actually has a moderate position on the subject. He would likely lean on Ukraine to accept a loss of territory in exchange for a ceasefire but he would not facilitate an outright defeat that resulted in the dissolution of the country.
6 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
Alex
@asenderling.eth
He specifically tried to get House Republicans to tank the Ukraine Aid package, has snubbed meetings with Zelensky, and refused invitations from his R senator colleagues to learn more about the conflict. He's the same kind of isolationist who would have allowed Hitler to seize all of Europe.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Leo
@lsn
I think both of you are probably completely accurate.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
According to him, he would not surrender Ukraine entirely to Putin so I can only go based on his own comments. His actions do suggest that he’s not pro-the current war.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
