Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

lucky pfp
lucky
@lsankar.eth
increasingly bullish on TEEs
2 replies
2 recasts
43 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Can you say more? I am still concerned about relying on custom hardware that has a history of vulnerabilities
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

lucky pfp
lucky
@lsankar.eth
I see 'trust chip/cloud provider' as an intermediate trust assumption b/w 'trust anon dev' and 'trust no one' certainly risk there (and I want FHE to be performant, it's just not yet for what i want to do), but feels 10x better than 'trust anon dev' also TEEs seem to be picking up in dev/ecosystem energy
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

humanagent.eth pfp
humanagent.eth
@humanagent.eth
Have you thought about xmtp to complement the transport ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

lucky pfp
lucky
@lsankar.eth
say more?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

humanagent.eth pfp
humanagent.eth
@humanagent.eth
If you interact with secure agents over the internet, that being for initialize them or sending sensitive inputs you would do it with e2ee? If there are multiple of these agent interactions then you need a protocol? This is where some of the thinking is right now https://x.com/humanagent_eth/status/1878204801223475481
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction