phil
@phil
not bad for passive income! anyone else?
10 replies
4 recasts
36 reactions
Anemale🎩↑🔵ツ
@anemale.eth
The concept of amps is definitely interesting, no doubt about that. But aren’t the earnings mostly going to users with the most followers? I understand the logic behind it, but it seems that smaller or mid-sized accounts don’t earn nearly as much , mainly those with large followings benefit
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Miguelgarest
@miguelgarest.eth
as with most things in FC (i.e. rewards), people with large following/OGs are the ones making the big amounts 🤷♂️
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Anemale🎩↑🔵ツ
@anemale.eth
Yes, that’s a reality miguel and I wanted to add this for @phil This isn’t meant as negative criticism, quite the opposite. It’s all about finding ways to grow and evolve. For what it’s worth, my favorite cartoon growing up was Robin Hood! Wouldn’t it be interesting if OGs with large followings had the option to share a portion of their earnings, maybe by sponsoring a smaller account of their choice or contributing to a crowdfunding ? Something along those lines could really strengthen the community spirit.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
loudsqueak
@loudsqueak
we are working on ways to improve a spender’s ability to select potential earners by more criteria, rather than just followers/price this will help to reward users who have smaller following sizes but are engaged with the platform in other ways
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Anemale🎩↑🔵ツ
@anemale.eth
yeah really love this 💜
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
