BUILD

There’s a new leaderboard on build.top, to help you find more great builders.

We called it “Undiscovered Builders”, and it shows builders that received valuable nominations, but still have 3 or less in total.

Nominate them today: @aflock @albiverse @paulcramer @jarrettr.eth @naaate @timtimtim @jonbray.eth

@base building https://onchainkit.xyz | Software Engineer @coinbase 

albiverse.xyz | 
mirror.xyz/albiverse.eth | /nervous host

Instigating /ottp & /luminous. Building @venturetothex. 

    Writing: https://paragraph.xyz/@nate  Channels: /lum /collaborate /openventures /higher /believein

Head of Engineering @Base 🔵


Nick's friend

Moshis in bio

DevRel @storyprotocol
IP is everything
Alumni @learnweb3 
Ex @bnbchain @flock_io 
Building /creader

There’s a new leaderboard on build.top, to help you find more great builders.

We called it “Undiscovered Builders”, and it shows builders that received valuable nominations, but still have 3 or less in total.

Nominate them today: @aflock @albiverse @paulcramer @jarrettr @naaate @timtimtim @sweetleaf.eth

this is a great feature for discoverability of builders , but i think the criteria is a bit too low - probably there's a long tail of people nominated 10-30 people but do not have same public profile as the top nomination with 100's or more of nominations

What do you think Felipe? 
https://warpcast.com/lior/0x9a6fd495

My logic was - when you have 10+ nomination - that's starting to be a signal there is someone building something enough people appreciate

1-2 nominations is a good start but is a weaker signal (though absolutely worth highlighting too!

Probably should just have a few filters people can use themself

thanks for the suggestion! we can look into it and do the test

but this long tails will probably be hundreds/thousands of builders so might not be very helpful for people looking for 1 or 2 new builders to nominate