Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
links š“
@links
Spark: LLMs seem magical, but they canāt create anything new. Humans seem magical, but doing mundane work saps their creativity. The more mundane tasks we can have Ai do for us, the more human creativity we will unlock. Launching memecoins is one thing, but what about creating websites, doing our taxes, and assembling data we need in the way we want to consume it? This is all pulling us closer to a āStar Trek Universeā, where we work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity.
1 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
naaate
@naaate
Can you think of some mundane tasks that an internet community would have? Just trying to think how removing mundane tasks can be more multi-player, not so "personal assistant."
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
links š“
@links
Hmm you say that like āpersonal assistantā is somehow lower on the hierarchy, but I donāt see it that way. ALL contribution is valuable, there are many different kinds of contribution, and there are certain tasks more fit for a 24/7 computer that can make connections between data. For instance - posting on socials about work going on in the DAO and tagging relevant people. You could call this āpersonal assistant workā, but there are professional marketers who do this and are invaluable to their org. All Iām trying to say is that well-functioning teams value each teammateās abilities and play to each teammateās strengths. Adding Ai to these teams is a net benefit if we play to that Aiās strengths.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
naaate
@naaate
Definitely didnāt mean to imply it is lower. Just trying to ask questions and see if we might push the thinking to new places. It also feels like multi-player use-cases are particularly relevant to Farcaster and lum
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
links š“
@links
Yeah I appreciate the question, gave me the opportunity to explain my POV! Multiplayer/distributed orgs are my jam. Iāve been working on creating a resilient one for over a decade
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
