data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30da9/30da9e39e002d8e5c029e76c6cd228e7c6c11fc3" alt="naaate pfp"
naaate
@naaate
1841 Following
3118 Followers
2 replies
2 recasts
14 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
2 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Cities aren’t just places—they’re networks of protocols that enable movement, trade, and coordination. Without traffic systems, movement is limited; better traffic flow expands transportation agency.
I see LUM the same way—a system where agentic protocols (and agents) interact and self-organize, expanding the agency of both humans and machines.
Take Aether and Clanker: Aether’s agency was limited, but when it could interact with Clanker through a human-language chat protocol, it indirectly launched a token. In this case no funds needed to be exchanged because there is built-in incentive alignment.
But how much human and AI agency is held back today due to a lack of protocols for agreements, exchange, and collaboration? Machines eventually tend to reduce costs, enabling more action per dollar spent. AI won’t just help humans and communities do more—it will help other AI do more, too.
LUM → A city for agentic protocols, working together for/with humans and communities. 0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
5 replies
2 recasts
14 reactions
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
11 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
3 replies
3 recasts
14 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
1 reply
3 recasts
11 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction