Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Linda Xie
@linda
Interesting, learned from the book Good Strategy Bad Strategy that DARPA "retains program managers for only four to six years to limit empire building and to bring in fresh talent. The expectation is that a new program manager will be willing to challenge the ideas and work of predecessors"
10 replies
3 recasts
39 reactions
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
Also reading this right now.
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
I remember mentally highlighting this part as well. Japanese public schools (at least in parts where I've interacted) do similar rotations with the entire staff, teachers, principals, and all. Not sure if it's also to prevent empire building, but I wouldn't be surprised if that's at least a consideration.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Frank
@deboboy
great read… have worked with DARPA people; cunning and resilient are they
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
I ordered this book and haven’t read it yet! Bumping it up now ty Linda
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ukstv
@ukstv.eth
One of consultancies I know of explicitly states, by the time you are 28 you either become a partner (rare) or go somewhere else. Same reasons. TBH, if you are 28 there, you have a line of willing prospective employers.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mectaron
@mecatron
Interesting indeed🤔
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
comm intern
@comm.eth
what does it say is wrong with empire building? curious to learn more 👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Luka →{protocell:labs}← 🎩
@luka
This is similar to the way top-notch universities and research institutes keep the edge. Unfortunately, the standard is the system where positions are almost “inherited” in a decades long process.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
eugen 🎭🍄
@madvac
sounds intriguing, that book just went on my reading list
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Spaceman Spiff 🎩🍖
@spaceman-spiff
The US government could use a similar ruleset.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
