I coordinated with the Jam team on the airdrop yesterday. They did an airdrop of 2M Jam (~$10k) to 885 users. I looked at their AI agent, channel, did a video chat, DMs and felt it was fine to distribute

This new Jam claim airdrop mechanism today is unrelated and I wasn't aware of the lock to claim faster mechanism. I don't agree with it and hope the team includes the constructive feedback on this from many users. If you do not agree with the locking mechanism, you do not have to participate

1) For future airdrop offers, we will ask teams to fill out a form and share more of their token info and plans publicly. We can't control what teams do in the future but we will support more transparency to help users make a decision

2) I understand the frustration around Jam's lock to claim faster mechanism announced today (I was not aware of it and it is separate from the airdrop yesterday). I don't believe it makes sense to "penalize" for the reaction to sell for those that don't agree with the mechanism so I'll make sure this action isn't factored in for future airdrop offers eligibility

Developer ecosystem @farcaster, co-founder @bountycaster. Previously: co-founder of Scalar Capital, product at Coinbase, co-producer @ethereumfilm

Going to be worth thinking of a framework here. I can see how people will complain about future scenarios they disagree with. 

💜💜💜

Chasing Curiosity. Pluralist. Empathetic Accelerationist. Founding Engineer @icebreaker. YC S16, KB7, fid:66
icbk.me/tayyab.fc

Framework is we surface more transparency to help users make a decision but we can't control future actions a project takes. Since this event today happened right after the claim yesterday, I'm comfortable with this being an exception and don't believe users should be penalized in this situation from future airdrops