Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/brypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
This take was so good I had to quote cast it twice We need a term like “schlep blindness” (https://paulgraham.com/schlep.html) for the crypto condition / the blind spot for non-speculative products — maybe “spec blindness”, but feels too on the nose In before @kia tells me speculation is good, actually
4 replies
3 recasts
20 reactions

kia pfp
kia
@kia
i will admit i have no idea what OP is saying
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

LGHT pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
lol never have i felt more wordcel than this morning, and i was just musing to avoid heat exhaustion grok’d it
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

kia pfp
kia
@kia
ok i understand now and i have a response: i don't think you can decouple the two. at least not at the product layer. at the infra layer, it's disillusioned to think a good protocol + a good narrative would do anything shitty example: red bull is a media company that monetizes via energy drinks (two in one) a stand alone food engineering company + a stand alone extreme sport publication wouldn't work on the same magnitude but also now i have no idea how what android was saying relates
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
it's weird because I really enjoyed the way you wrote it I must be a wordcel at heart
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction