nouns-duna

If you really intend to execute DUNA, why is a DAO still necessary? From a procedural standpoint, it would make more sense to dissolve the DAO, refund its members, and then have those of you based in the US establish a traditional foundation.

Since a large number of DAO members are from all around the world, why should the DAO compromise for the US-based members?

If proposals cannot be executed in a permissionless manner, what is the point of the DAO?

Hey Nouns,

Recently, I’ve taken an interest in following this channel and commenting on various posts due to my work with legal entity solutions at @midao. Since then, @thethriller and I have spoken to a few Nouns members about our offering, and they recommended we post here for total clarity and to potentially provide some insights.

Before I begin, I want to be fully transparent and upfront with everyone as a sort of “disclaimer.” I’m biased—strongly so. I believe the Marshall Islands DAO LLC is the best entity to incorporate a DAO, which is why I work at MIDAO. Furthermore, I’m not a member of the Nouns, nor is anyone on our team. We may not have all the details or context compared to DAO members, but based on the discussions I’ve seen in this channel, I’d like to provide additional information about MIDAO.

There are other options for global DAOs…

There are other options for global DAOs… 
https://warpcast.com/leohenkels/0x01592f0e