Ethereum-style smart contracts are ideal for tokenizing the rebuild of Los Angeles… 

but it has to be on the Bitcoin blockchain, sorry folks

Ethereum-style smart contracts are ideal for tokenizing the rebuild of Los Angeles… 

but it has to be on the Bitcoin blockchain, sorry folks 

https://medium.com/humanizing-the-singularity/getting-home-permit-to-permanence-the-new-normal-and-financing-the-rebuilding-of-la-with-bitcoin-8b9bd21300a3

Release Coordinator for the 2015 Ethereum launch. Now CEO of Mattereum, solving the Real World Asset problem.

Rated 💯 by multiple networks. Fluent in /unglish. Unbothered by /whatday of the week it is.

Allegedly a designer.

Yes. It’s too heavy a lift for Ethereum. 

Unfortunately.

Due to the size of capital pooled there, in short?

editor https://lowercase.cards/ prev: everyname (acq. Q4 '23)

The tech is BitScape’s — L1.5 they call it, because weird stuff has to happen to bind to bitcoin precisely.

Thanks for sharing, the /rwa will likely be interested in Mattereum

Are you your own L2 on Bitcoin? Can you share more on the technical architecture? Most people here might only be familiar with say Stacks

Would love to see but won’t happen. California does not believe in free markets. 

One of the many reasons it has to rebuild in the first place.