Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
It's obvious that we specify the license type in our Open Source GitHub repos. Why we don't do it with NFTs? Great essay about crypto in general, sniped by @thatalexpalmer.eth
2 replies
3 recasts
13 reactions
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
I couldn't be bothered reading the whole thing but the part about NFTs and licenses is complete nonsense. (i) It's confused about why NFTs do or don't have value. (If you buy art you also don't get a copyright license.) (ii) It's confused about how licensing actually works.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
(i) you don't get the license when you buy tradart but some nfts let you create derivative works. why not make the licensing transparent like we do in Open Source? You might have a few predefined options to choose from and it's clear from Day 1. anyway I think @leashless-matr might be a better person to answer :)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Vinay Gupta
@leashless-matr
Fair point that you don’t get IP rights with trad art @clauswilke But the Bored Apes were meant to be entrepreneurial weren’t they? You buy an ape and can Do Stuff with it? https://www.theboredapegazette.com/post/here-s-what-we-know-about-the-bored-ape-yacht-club-x-bape-shoe-drop-tomorrow-according-to-ngbshpend
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Vinay Gupta
@leashless-matr
So in this instance is Yuga the only entity that can profit from Bored Ape merch? If they feature your ape you don’t get revenue etc. All very messy. I don’t like it.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
