nouns-duna

Curious to understand what DUNA solves that wouldn’t be solved with:
* Remove the veto
* Dissolve Nouns foundation 
* Further protocolize Nouns (e.g Vrbs streaming)

I think the main thing would be token holder/voter liability.

The solution is to make the treasury distribution programatic. For example, no one is KYC'ing Unsiwap LPs or Bitcoin miners or ETH stakers. Why? Because they are being paid programmatically by the protocol itself.

Voters can be fully anon. 

Also, more programmatic treasury distribution might solve this (?)

Noun 1111 & 913 ✦ Founder: /alps | boards.wtf | /yellow | @thenounsquare | /sendit ↗️ ✦ I’m HYPΣR ✦⁺ & nounish af ⌐◧-◧

Voters can be fully anon. 

Also, more programmatic treasury distribution might solve this (?)

https://warpcast.com/lay2000lbs/0x31175fb2

Not sure anon voting is plausible. Might be better to remove the need to vote. Something like an unstoppable stream that you can direct in real time by staking a noun on an address would be more defensible.

Nouns

quick update on flows.wtf 🚀 

✔️ vote with Nouns on @base contract finished
✔️ UI scaffolding finished
✔️ Indexer built and DB setup to show live onchain data
✔️ WYSIWYG markdown editor + drafts functionality built
✔️ Flow contracts to manage superfluid streams via Nouner votes
✔️ Basic TCR contract
✔️ Mintable ERC20 votes contract

TODO: 
- Finalize TCR arbitrator contract
- Voting integration into frontend
- Build grant page + builder updates flow (using Farc)
- TCR token emission contract
- TCR challenge + voting UI
- Audit with 0x52 (~2 weeks)

https://github.com/wkocjan/nouns-flows
https://github.com/rocketman-21/flow-contracts

What’s the issue with anon voting?

Steaming like this is currently being worked on for Noun by Vrbs (cc @rocketman): 

https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/582

https://warpcast.com/rocketman/0x218edf06

bringing the makers together 

/nouns /vrbs

Contributor to crypto, building Based Management, co-founder of PoolTogether Inc, instigator of pleasrDAO

https://leighton.mirror.xyz/

Well presumably you would need to make the ownership of the noun itself anon. Otherwise you still have same liability issue. So that’s what I was thinking would not be feasible