Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Toady Hawk pfp
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
There was some discussion and criticism of the /nouns-retro rounds earlier today by my friend @peterpandam and others, with the main allegation being that the rounds have been full of builders simply executing their proposals and thus "double-dipping." Setting aside the fact that there are currently no active propdate rounds and there was no rule against active builders posting updates there, I just really didn't think that was a fair portrayal of how the rounds have been going (at least since I volunteered to help @seneca moderate them a couple months ago and have therefore been paying closer attention.) For my own sanity, I quickly went through the top 15 paid casts from each of the previous 2 rounds and did a little Saturday night spreadsheet warrior-ing to find that of these 30 retro rewards... (results in next cast)
8 replies
1 recast
24 reactions

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
tbf there’s good reason to presume that /nouns-retro derived from retro funding rounds on prop.house and inherited its spirit and principles - I’m surprised by others being surprised.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Toady Hawk pfp
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
Which spirit and principles were those (I honestly forget lol)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction