Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alex pfp
Alex
@asenderling.eth
This tweet demonstrates the intellectual bankruptcy of the left. Once you're already at the worst possible description you lose a sense of nuance or daylight between Trump's policy and Harris'. The practical result is full ethnic cleansing and 1,000s of lives. https://x.com/NathanJRobinson/status/1886937360920666438
7 replies
1 recast
12 reactions

0xl0wlevelcr0w pfp
0xl0wlevelcr0w
@l0wlevelcr0w
I'm not seeing how the nuance between the policies is beneficial to the people of Gaza or the voters who want to end the suffering of gazans. Could you explain to me why I should compromise my vote to support genocide lite if I'm opposed to genocide in all it's forms?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Alex pfp
Alex
@asenderling.eth
You're not 'voting to support genocide' in this case you'd be voting to prevent complete ethnic cleansing as that was clearly not on the table under Harris but is totally on the table for Trump. If you don't think there's a difference between 100k deaths and 1 million deaths idk what you tell you.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

0xl0wlevelcr0w pfp
0xl0wlevelcr0w
@l0wlevelcr0w
I guess I'm not seeing how a million people are gonna die under one and not the other or why that wouldn't happen under a slow perpetual creep of land theft over trump's idiot blitzkrieg land theft.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

0xl0wlevelcr0w pfp
0xl0wlevelcr0w
@l0wlevelcr0w
I understand my policy of opposing all forms of genocide isn't popular and won't win elections in a democracy, but If democrats and Republicans don't want my vote. That's fine with me. I hope more people will join my cause and a political party will want my vote. But if not I'd rather be principled than tacitly support genocide because one side is less gruesome.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction