Kyle McCollom
@kyle
Socialfi is not a social app with finance / transacting signing in it. Socialfi is the financialization of a following - buying and selling of accounts. So Friendtech, Scoop, Drakula, BitClout, etc. Not Farcaster or Lens, which are open social graphs that you could build socialfi products on top of (like Scoop).
2 replies
14 recasts
11 reactions
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
If this were the case, then TikTok, Instagram, etc would all be socialfi. They are not.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Juli 🎩↑
@juli
we're talking in the web3 context: hence, the underlying open data, blockchain data should be a given (> compare socialfi, defi, not cefi) Aside that, facebook had very interesting early developments with their games. Lots of developers pushed apps but relied on the ad model, payments or subscription (if that was even enabled). I would love to see such games in a farcaster explore miniapp section AND enable users to play for cryptos. That would be A perfect socialfi use case. https://warpcast.com/juli/0x92315fdf
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
If Uniswap adds a feed of the memecoins your Farcaster friends are buying, is that socialfi? If any DeFi frontend adds social context, is that socialfi? Is Zora socialfi, since you can mint what your friends are minting? All of the answers here are no. That's too broad of a definition and unhelpful as a term.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
Another good definition here: is the financial component built into the protocol itself. It is for Friendtech, Scoop, Drakula, BitClout, etc. It is not for Farcaster or Lens.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Juli 🎩↑
@juli
No one is arguing Farcaster / Lens 😄 I can sympathize with the built-in definition but I still see value in a broader definition. I’d make a difference between 1️⃣ apps with a social feed, chat, graph but no (social) transactions (not socialfi) — 2️⃣ responsive / interactive apps where you take a financial action with/against other user, app, curves (min socialfi: apps like time.fun with tw integration, Drakula got social & financial use case but not combined) 3️⃣ responsive/interactive web 3 social chat, channel, graph + financial action + gamification/speculation (max socialfi) 👉🏻A uniswap frontend with a feed where you can only copy trades or read & text isn’t socialfi. 👉🏻A uniswap frontend with a web 3 social channel/chat where you can do transactions in chat or do some gamified trading on the platform with/against other users is a socialfi app (this is a simple use case 50 teams should jump on!) This doesn’t make uniswap - the protocol - socialfi.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction