Would Farcaster plus lots of client apps make it harder for governments to block Farcaster than Twitter?

My gut is it wouldn’t be as effective as using a VPN - governments compiling a list of most clients and blocking them will still be feasible.

Would Farcaster plus lots of client apps make it harder for governments to block Farcaster than Twitter?

My gut is it wouldn’t be as effective as using a VPN - governments compiling a list of most clients and blocking them will still be feasible. https://x.com/goddeketal/status/1776984641766822053?s=46

summoning /daylight | kylemccollom.com | we are hiring: careers.daylight.xyz

This is sad, the worst thing is that people in Brazil are so driven by political division that they don't see evil/errors in the opposition. Unfortunately, some people think these behaviours are normal because of ignorance or in some cases lack of education. Thanks for letting people know the truth.

So this is the same question that was asked about front ends for contracts on ETH. I believe the solution is to keep a front end open source.

Take Balancer for instance, you can go to their github. Grab their entire website. And run it yourself. No one can block that.

A locally run front end would make it hard to ban

Yes, decentralized protocol plus many front ends (even self hosted) is the way