growth

realizing now that the VC funnel most likely filters out a ton great GTM founders because selling a decacorn idea is way different than selling a product people want to use.  no users care what your TAM is, no VC cares if your product is buggy

vibe architect for /opacity --
host of vibe check podcast 
▶️ https://pods.media/vibe-check
❄️ icebreaker.xyz/dawufi
👀 seemore.tv/free/fc/dawufi

The pockets where start-up capital comes from is changing a little bit at the moment within crypto would you agree? @bhaji you may have some good thoughts on this one about where smart money is coming from to support growth of start-ups

Here for 'Proof of' tokenisation and on-chain Commerce.📈 /growth at poap.xyz I 🟪 /purple DAO 🦁 @safary mod for /london + /poap


We’re still seeing activity, but on average smaller check sizes and investment in multiple competitive projects (vs going all in on one) when they have conviction for a use case.

How are they navigating conflict of interest and privacy, betting on multiple competitors?

Building something new. Host: /venturecapital /adventures /theitinerant

This is liquid hedge not VC. Disheartening to hear founders take capital from these mercenaries who are backing use cases and not people.

Building Persistence Capital.
Founder @Upside.
Ecosystem @ Hansa.
Starting fresh on Farcaster

They’re still betting on the people when there are hundreds is companies saying they do similar things (in our case, RWAs)