Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? it could: 1. amplify reach (shared audiences) 2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort) 3. build deeper connections maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?
31 replies
29 recasts
174 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Because none of my friends are going to pay $5 to use Twitter but with only 1000 people. The issue is onboarding. People just say nah. This is the real issue. There is no incentive to get normal people on here. Until they subsidize growth and attack churn like a SaaS would then it’s just gonna be the same 1000 people casting at each other everyday like it is now.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
not about new people, existing people! need to tackle that first. what’s blocking the behavior of current users who used to do that?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Having to ask permission to join a channel is the core issue. It will never scale and truly ruined the farcaster experience.
4 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
Konohime
@konohime.eth
Yes and no, bots were really a big issue to moderate and ruined any chances for small accounts to be seen
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
agree with this for last year, but the bots seem to be under control?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Konohime
@konohime.eth
Because channels are gatekeeped, yes :) But on the other hand, asking for permission to enter a channel is... Unusual I'd say in the crypto space. I won't say it's a "core issue" tho
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
The data directly disagrees
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
