Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
I'm actually not yet sure if burning is a good idea. Could be, just not sure and am open to it. 1) Suboptimal from a vibes/ethos standpoint 2) Signals somewhat of a desperation i.e., needing the price to go up AND it not going up 3) Less to distribute and grow the network https://warpcast.com/ripe/0x3f238ac4
6 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
It kind of betrays the focus/priorities of the network and the conviction it has in the token vis a vis creating real attention-value as a network Kinda short-term thinking coded
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

john pfp
john
@know
would've been better to have all that higher added as permanent LP provision
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

SAINTLESS pfp
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
We have more than enough higher in the LP. ETH side could be better yeah we're still dealing with the consequences of it being initially launched on tokepad. Aggregated LP isn't as bad as it seems.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

john pfp
john
@know
yeah, instead of buy/burn, it could be add ETH to lp I feel like you understand more than me, but I also feel like having a thicker LP would bolster the strength of higher
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

john pfp
john
@know
as a brand, as a token, as an ecosystem that wants to fund people and things
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction