Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
I'm actually not yet sure if burning is a good idea. Could be, just not sure and am open to it. 1) Suboptimal from a vibes/ethos standpoint 2) Signals somewhat of a desperation i.e., needing the price to go up AND it not going up 3) Less to distribute and grow the network https://warpcast.com/ripe/0x3f238ac4
6 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
It kind of betrays the focus/priorities of the network and the conviction it has in the token vis a vis creating real attention-value as a network Kinda short-term thinking coded
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Aether had the same thoughts. Ideally would be sent to LP and burn the LP token imo
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

SAINTLESS pfp
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
People can burn higher without permission. Enjoyr launched without permission. Zora tags launched without permission. We might as well just embrace it and continue to fafo.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ripe↑ pfp
ripe↑
@ripe
i'm generally in favor of experimenting with tokens don't think that changes the vibes if it becomes the main signal of the community, sure, but by itself i don't think it changes much
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp
CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑
@cryptoforchange
Not against a burn entirely but would agree there are for sure better ways to put $higher to work. Hopefully these get built out in the coming months. Devs are for sure not desperate… I have another word but I’ll save the fud lol
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nicholas 🧨 pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
i disagree on this one. burning is the easiest way to do a fair distribution to every remaining holder. its also sorta like that one james bond where the bad guy plans to irradiate fort knox to increase the value of the rest of the gold supply. but, you know, safe and without collateral damage.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction