Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
GM Builders! There was a suggestion to change the proposal threshold back to 1 (currently 2 needed). Drop comments here as well with any feedback. I’ll also add it to the agenda for Thursday’s DAO meeting. cc: @kmacb.eth https://discord.com/channels/1039595167910477936/1178772723133067334
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

zamees pfp
zamees
@zamees
2
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
At what number does it feel discriminatory? 3, 4, 5??
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

zamees pfp
zamees
@zamees
G'day, I agree that this is an important part of the conversation, though would like to see it presented as a viewpoint vs. ad hominem. Additionally, I recognize that DAOs are problematically a "pay to power" economy--the financial path of this DAO may benefit from a high bar to publish props atm.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
My bad if anyone feels attacked. Not my intent. My viewpoint is cloudy at best & is one of trying to understand. Asked in the spirit of increasing sustainability. UX is misleading. Win auction & become a second class member. I am curious, what number of tokens do you think is too high?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

zamees pfp
zamees
@zamees
Thank you for accepting feedback with grace and recognizing my effort to lead with empathy. Could you be more specific and point to what specifically in the user journey is misleading, and/or do you mean something in the UI?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction