Builder

GM Builders! There was a suggestion to change the proposal threshold back to 1 (currently 2 needed). Drop comments here as well with any feedback. 

I’ll also add it to the agenda for Thursday’s DAO meeting. 

cc: @kmacb.eth

Ethereum builder & people connector. @juicebox revnet.eth.sucks defifa.net d33m.com

GM Builders! There was a suggestion to change the proposal threshold back to 1 (currently 2 needed). Drop comments here as well with any feedback. 

I’ll also add it to the agenda for Thursday’s DAO meeting. 

cc: @kmacb.eth 

https://discord.com/channels/1039595167910477936/1178772723133067334

building /gmfarcaster network |
blockchain ENT prof |  ⌐◧-◧ Nouncillor, Nouner, BuilderDAO community resident /builder |

https://www.gmfarcaster.com/ 

Author, groovy thinker, artist, generalist, founder, web3 enthusiast, traveler, NounsBuilder Ops & Guild.

G'day, I agree that this is an important part of the conversation, though would like to see it presented as a viewpoint vs. ad hominem. Additionally, I recognize that DAOs are problematically a "pay to power" economy--the financial path of this DAO may benefit from a high bar to publish props atm.

At what number does it feel discriminatory? 3, 4, 5??