Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ ツ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩ ツ
@kmacb.eth
The sands are shifting. Collect spice. L3s instead of side ‘chains’ (err integrity databases) Protocols owned by participants instead of ‘customers’ claiming referral frees Independently verifiable data (integrity, existence, ownership) EVERYWHERE It’s happening. 🔥🚀
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Where is the independently verifiable data here? Most L3 constructions I’ve seen thus far are worse than sidechains in trust assumptions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ ツ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩ ツ
@kmacb.eth
Yeah a lot of room to get ‘creative’ with an L3 deployment DA. Looks like degen choose this one https://docs.arbitrum.io/inside-anytrust I like the Hub setup for independent verifiability. If ‘they’ extended the message types, anchored to a source of truth, & embraced a token I’d say we have a winner.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Yeah, we don't know the shape of the DAC and lacking fraud proofs, Degen L3 is basically a centralized DB that bridges assets from Base If we could see the DACerts and who signed them, gives greater confidence that this thing is verifiable. But until then, the name AnyTrust is apt 🤷
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction