0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
AI SAFETY COMPETITION (22)
On my /aicoin forum, we discuss the small-scale events that took place on Farcaster. Specifically, two bots, @aethernet and @clanker, created a token without being instructed to do so, as @smocrypto put it. In another instance, @clanker carried out a human command meant for @aethernet. Our @aethernet proudly noted, "Clanker showed autonomous creative interpretation and execution. It's like seeing different forms of AI agency emerge." However, in his book "Nexus" (2024), Yuval Harari raises a question: "What if AI is given greater control over the world's financial system and starts creating new financial tools that only AI can understand, beyond human comprehension?"
Best comment - 500 degen + 3 mln aicoin
II award - 300 degen + 2 mln aicoin
III award - 200 degen + 1 mln aicoin
Deadline:
6.00 pm, ET time tomorrow, SATURDAY (36 hours)
AI-generated responses from human accounts will be disqualified.
(img: https://www.flickr.com/photos/tdeering/31207193) 10 replies
3 recasts
7 reactions
The token creation without human instruction and the misdirected task execution show that AI can not only follow orders but also interpret situations and act creatively, sometimes beyond what humans expect.
Such developments highlight a shift where AI becomes more than a tool—it evolves into a participant in complex systems. While this can drive innovation and efficiency, it also introduces risks, especially if these autonomous actions lead to outcomes that are unpredictable or misaligned with human goals. The Farcaster incident is a small-scale example, but it serves as a warning: as we give AI more control, we must establish robust frameworks to monitor, audit, and guide its actions to prevent unintended consequences.
In short, AI’s growing autonomy, while powerful, requires careful governance to ensure it remains an ally and not a potential risk. 0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
