Warpcast mobile vs. web usage last 30 days

some crypto people: "but I use desktop all day, we don't need mobile"

my brother in christ, the majority of the human population uses mobile to access the internet, and if you think that trend is going to slow down, I have a very promising shitcoin to sell you

React Native Developer. Experimenting with consumer apps, built /vibra mobile.

💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩

lol just saying that some people here are delusional, literally last week I saw a cast about how mobile isn't necessary

fuck mainstream adoption, right?

happy to continue ruining my reputation by saying the mobile-first obsession is a delusion. sure, it makes sense sometimes, but starting your biz on the premise that every solution fits into a phone is bonkers. so many square pegs, round holes. i hold this belief regardless of the ux around mobile wallets

I never do crypto stuff on my phone unless forced

https://warpcast.com/usersteen.eth/0x52777453
https://warpcast.com/sonyasupposedly/0xa2a7ab27

Also, neither cast you shared said mobile isn't necessary. Miss me

Strat/art/design. Thoughts: /user-steen Director: /enjoy Guild: /metaliminal Zora: zora.co/@usersteen

ok, maybe "a priority" would have been a better wording than "necessary"

but I stand by my point, farcaster is primarily a social media product, and social media users expect a mobile experience, so we should be obsessing over mobile-first

i think i'd like to know who the power users are and what they use. mobile users tend to consume more and simply read through casts than deploy bangers.

it's not that people choose mobile and are unable to make bangers out of choice, it's the fact that the tooling on desktop is far more and the ux is easier to deal with than mobile.

let's say this is true, do you think it applies to traditional social media apps too?

what will happen when more creators start using farcaster and are forced to use the desktop client to deploy bangers?