Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
the feed feels stale these past 2 weeks with attention on X for trump/biden, lack of anything exciting in crypto (sorry, prove me wrong), ethCC, and general summer offlineness. so plz reply with a hot take or an exciting project or something anything that will give @randomerror.eth’s back a break from carrying us all
25 replies
1 recast
170 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
If you build your core product on the back of service provider startups that haven't been battle-tested or proven themselves, you shouldn't complain when those startups fail and make your product function poorly And it's your job as a founder and the brand behind the product to communicate throughout its lifecycle
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
kia
@kia
yup, it was 2 months too late. but i'm glad it came at last.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Wait, why? I would prefer the radio silence over throwing your SaaS providers under the bus
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kia
@kia
their service provider was the category leader -- maybe still unproven but nonetheless the best option. I don't think jacek could've launched his own rollup without a provider. so it was between this or not doing a rollup at all. what bugged me was that there was no accountability at the time. and one of the reasons why there was no accountability was that there was no public discourse around what's gone wrong. curious how you're thinking about it
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
> not doing a rollup at all Being pedantic, not a rollup since alt-DA. An "optimium" if you will, but actually centralized side chain run by Conduit msig Honestly, not doing the L3 was the right move. If you can't build a rocket ship yourself, you should probably hold off on going to space
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
