Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
FWB was ahead of the curve? Yes but. The in-person dynamics are a factor — this argues these clubs provide an IRL Neverland where you can feel younger than you are, and still have something exclusive in a world where it’s impossible to gatekeep https://www.gq.com/story/how-new-yorks-social-life-went-members-only
4 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

raihan pfp
raihan
@raihan
hey that’s us 😂
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
omg i forgot you can perceive me hi
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

raihan pfp
raihan
@raihan
HI! :))) I liked this piece. But I think the rise of irl “members only” clubs is funny because folks contain multitudes. In lieu of serving those niche interests at a high level, many of these clubs will invariably regress to mean offerings (e.g. fancy coworking vibes or simple status plays.)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
and how many of those middling clubs can the market support? the pendulum shall forever swing. so it goes just btwn us, there is only 1 exclusive club i have ever longed to join. but you have to *really* earn your way in. you can't just be hot/rich. membership 4 me requires life changes https://www.explorers.org/
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
if you get to go in they have all these treasures from all the explorers over the years
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction