Something I worry about: is how any position that is not extreme will get invariably get “primaried” by those with more extreme positions in any online debate. 

They will attract more energy , easier to get social capital and also plays well to most online algorithms. 

Having the center get and hold energy seems an unsolved problem.

I think killing the algorithm fixes this but no one likes that idea

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

Photographer, Visual Artist | on WEB3 since 2021 https://foundation.app/@Klunk22?tab=owned | 

Because it IS the product in a way and the argument is you’re defacto destroying social media if no algo

Idk. I can’t really steelman this I vote for nuke it lol

Why nobody likes the idea? I mean, what’s the point of having totally nonsense discussions going viral?

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

This attached on a  tweet where someone got brigades for not treating a stupid idea seriously 

Ofc you don’t, but ur offering urself up for the thunderdome to loudly be moderate in this env. Why centrism gets drowned out

the “on Twitter you have to treat them like real, serious ideas” is delusional

no, you don’t have to LOL

no one is forcing anyone to treat them like real, serious ideas

intersubjective mechanism design @ poidh.xyz - come chill /poidh + follow @poidhbot

I think a lot more normal people think those ideas are legit than DolphinMossad wants to believe

you talked to a normie recently? they believe some wild shit

But really why still bother using Twitter is my question :p

Regression to the extreme seems very black mirror esque

Similar case to extreme human facial expressions on YouTube thumbnails

idk but visiting hawaii is so good! idc about anyone that talk about it in a bad way lol