Catch0x22
@catch0x22
gonna go out on a limb here and say none of the degen paired clankers will move
5 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Ya cause no liquidity
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Catch0x22
@catch0x22
i just can't see ppl swapping degen for a random clanker, would have to be special
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
I’d def do that but not without deep enough pairs
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
If Jacek dropped one or maybe wake then I think it could go… Liquidity would be a constraint, yet could be managed if someone got in early and decided to LP Did they discuss the reasoning around liquidity levels vs the main Clanker pairs. @proxystudio.eth The paired tokens on mint club have just done okay, agree the need to have a different asset than WETH is tough generally. Cuts you off from many segments of society. I have an overly complicated Degen project that would pair nicely for this… yet would likely require more lifting than I could manage.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
alex
@proxystudio.eth
Honestly this is more an interface & router issue than anything else Mint club bonding curves are cool but think other solutions are simpler short term Gonna do some testing with initial liq Bigger issues here is needing to onboard new capital, we’re seeing new users but mainly on creator side
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Degen needs more mcap to handle the liq depth that’s the issue, otherwise you are playing trade backs to eth always
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
Price volatility stuff is real but don’t think it’s as much a factor here Routers handle whatever optimization needs to happen on the backend. As we’ve seen with virtuals all of this stuff is essentially less significant than the existence of demand Plenty of relatively minor things that we can do to tweak all of these pool initializations
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
