Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Kate Kornish
@katekornish
my dear farcasters humansdid is aimed to verify what commercial brands are selling us as their activism. we’ll have the power to approve or reject their projects. and If a project gets approved, we can track its progress and earn rewards for our participation directly from those brands and partners. i’d love to see my dear farcaster community among the first voters for project #0. let’s make a real change by using the resources of those who can actually make it happen. sign up on humansdid.com. any boost is appreciated 💜 https://paragraph.xyz/@katekornish/what-is-humansdid
4 replies
3 recasts
20 reactions
Trigs
@trigs
Sounds interesting. Help me out if I'm getting it: - It's a public ranking site where ppl can rank projects/initiatives based on their perception of its impact. - Participants can earn reputation/rewards for engaging with projects, whether it be on the ground (assuming) or just through the site by providing impact analysis. If I'm not totally wrong, I have questions: 1. What's the proof of personhood to prevent ranking manipulation? 2. Is there anything to quantify people's expertise to provide an analysis, or is it based purely on just ranking public perception? Meaning, will there be objective third party expert analysis to help educate ppl, or will ppl just be going off of their limited experience and whatever quantitative analysis the project themselves provide? I have a lot more questions based on some of the answers/clarifications... Seems like an interesting idea but I'm really curious about implementation because this is an extremely challenging problem space to tackle!
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
torii.base.eth
@torii-stories
What would a hypothetically approved project look like? Any real world examples or ideas?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chic Bangs
@chic
🫡 signed up
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DV
@degenveteran.eth
💚
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
