Gnars

Community owned action sports brand. Daily drops on [That's Gnarly](https://thatsgnar.ly). Powered by [Nouns DAO](https://nouns.wtf/vote/51). Join via ongoing auctions at [gnars.wtf](https://gnars.wtf). Be kind & [settle.wtf](https://settle.wtf). Successor to [Gnars OG](https://opensea.io/collection/gnars). Learn more at [gnars.com](https://gnars.com).

Gnars DAO isn’t our future, but an iteration on DAOs might be.

Gnars . cc is where I’ll share my deeper thought, but for now…

Gnars CC as in:

+ Crypto Currency 
+ Creative Commons
+ Credit Cartel

Our mission: grow the brand and accrue value back to our community coin.

Wdyt?

Continuing to follow Zora’s lead is a major L. Overall, I’d like to see less of this trend chasing / hype machine / next shiny thing mentality. How many of your coin side projects have succeeded @gami.eth ? How many of your DAO side projects have failed? I don’t see a track record for a Gnars coin to be successful. I see it as another Gami experiment, tacked on to Gnars bc where else could you do it? Gnars still has some liquidity - so why not right?

Senior Web Dev • Metaverse Nomad • Class of 2020 • Mug Dispenser @ Franky's Tavern • Hosting: /punkrock • Building: mugclub.wtf • More: linktr.ee/juxton

Nothing. My point is - how does this actually benefit Gnars? It seem like another Gami money lego experiment, tacked onto Gnars because it is one of the few “subcults” left standing. If Gnars has a treasury and governance problem - how does the DAO borrowing capital actually help anything? Why would we borrow and deploy more capital when we have a fundamental issue of ROI and accountability for money already deployed.