Just Build on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ghostlinkz pfp

@ghostlinkz.eth

The problem with the Warpcast Power Badge is that many spammers have it. Here's a list of the top 100 casts with the most recasts in the last 24 hours, made by users with the Power Badge data.hubs.neynar.com/public/dashboards/b1FfpKPs0IPEVvsopekEgCrlJK7a8CqARAeMRSvC To create a clean list, I had to manually filter out 145 FIDs that are spamming but still have the Power Badge. You can find the list of these accounts here docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SMqs9VqucNo93k9doDJZMBtUwp4OjuzdwLjBo22MnNA If I can identify these accounts with a reasonable amount of effort, then so can the Warpcast team. As it stands, the Power Badge is not very useful. Don’t just take my word for it, analyze the data via @neynar

64 replies

17 recasts

87 reactions

Just Build pfp

This is fascinating. How exactly did you come to the conclusion that I'm a spammer? I only doing unique casts a few times a day on 2-3 channels. Most frequently in my own channel, which is also called /justbuild, the other is /powermonday which is designed to help people achieve a power badge through engagement. I spend the rest of my time on the platform replying to interesting casts I come across through the feeds I'm served through FC. I have never done a token giveaway and I do not engagement farm. So, I am wondering what exactly are you basing your criteria on.

3 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

David Wedderman pfp

David Wedderman

Teaching users how to achieve a power badge sounds a tad bit like teaching people how to spam... to a new user on this platform that is. Maybe you actually do have meaningful content that teaches people how to post things that will gain organic activity but the way it's sounds like I said is you teach people how to spam

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Just Build pfp

lol, so again. I have never engaged in spamming, in anyway shape or form. I prefer conversation and replies. 90% of my casts are text. I actually didn't even start tipping until about a month ago. Since then I actually find the activity fun, its like a gamified system of engagement. I achieved my badge by doing what you are doing. Starting a conversation with someone that has a badge. Once I found out that was actually how you earned a badge I started doing it regularly, then constantly, and then poof a badge. Through that process I met a group of PBs that invited me to the PM channel, where we make ourselves available to non badge holders (many who don't speak english as their first language) to engage with us. Some of it is silly, some of it is not. But policing what you consider valuable or meaningful, funny or useless is where this whole discussion is breaking down along the edges. I think it would have been much more constructive without the label since it was design to judge. But, that's just me.

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

David Wedderman pfp

David Wedderman

Like I said I'm a new user on here so I honestly have no idea what your content is like. I just felt your original defense didn't really do you a good defense if you know what I mean, but how you just explained it to me it feels and sounds now like you are doing nothing of wrong intent. Also not knowing how this platform works coming mainly from the old twitter days I always jump to bots and fake users and things of the such and how much that was taught... The theme of numbers over quality of numbers. So the thought of people teaching others how to get interactions makes me jump to that I'm my brain

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Just Build pfp

Yeah, its all good. I could tell by your response that you were missing some of the nuance around the topic. If you don't have some domain experience with these things it might sound off, ildi is one of the very first users, so he knows. But that also tells you why he likely has a very strong opinion on the state of the discourse on FC. Low FIDs vs newer accounts drawn by incentivized engagement often butt heads. Its a cultural clash. PBs are a very new patch that is being used to try to identify "quality" casters that are actively engaged with the platform and its the debate over what defines quality that brings us here. If you want deep dive conversations about data to be the norm, then you probably consider the prevalence of Pepe GM casts, designed to generate engagement and with it incentives, an affront to that vision. The Pepe GM casters would beg to differ. I'm in the camp where I think its all relevant and to cast a wide enough net to grow you need to cater to both sides of that coin. ✌️ 😁

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

David Wedderman pfp

David Wedderman

So it's a case of OG's not caring for new cats?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Just Build pfp

You know man, I'm oversimplifying this like CRAZY for the sake of discussion, but there is definitely a lot of that in the mix. At the end of the day like most thigns everyone is kinda right, and kinda wrong. Just depends on how you want to draw a conclusion or extract an answer. Its complicated, every social tech is since there is no clear yes/no lever to pull. Personally I think its a pretty good system that needs to be tweaked a lot and that's what's happening, in real time, as we all use it, which is why these kinds of discussions go off the rails like this. When you judge a cast you are judging the output of a person, so its easy to understand why people take it personally. But, just so you understand how this works, because I have a PB and have engaged with you and followed you, you are now more likely to get one eventually. Keep going ser. 👊 😁

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

David Wedderman pfp

David Wedderman

And I only even stumbled upon all that cause I've learned to mint random things and engage with things I don't quite understand because if it's on coin base wallet messing with it might earn me an airdrop of some sorts down the line, so I got here basically for all the wrong reasons

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

David Wedderman pfp

David Wedderman

Lol. I can understand stuck views from a "OG's" you have something that you feel like you helped start and it was good the way it was, even open people get worried by change and how it could affect things. Even as a new user I have concerns about a system that is incentive based and has other things like some subscription thing that has profit share or something in it which is what made me stumble upon this. Especially cause that system is not very plain spoken to a person on day one

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction