July
@july
I think more because great curation is an art. And as Walter Benjamin in the “The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility” points out - the artistic aura of a work of art matters, the context of the locale and culture it is embedded into matters. The time and space in which it exists matters. It really means that the directness of the experience matters. Somewhere even the knowledge of owning an original painting knowing the artist painted it versus it was produced mechanically in a repetitive manner changes the mood of how one feels towards the work
3 replies
31 recasts
82 reactions
July
@july
Why is it that — when I receive a handwritten letter - it is somehow is much more meaningful than receiving an email with the exact same message. The fact that someone used their time for me, is amazing. Not that one is better than the other, just different context and different understanding of the locale that the work was embedded into
4 replies
0 recast
39 reactions
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
it’s entirely possible that some folks around here don’t realize that people go to school to study curating, it’s a vocation adjacent and not dissimilar to artistic production itself. usually that means expertise in assembling and displaying artworks in a physical gallery but can also extend to monographs, catalogue raisonné, all sorts of publications. so, imo makes sense to prefer this type of curation in the same way that you would likely buy a painting by a human painter vs. making something on Midjourney to hang on your wall.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
tim/vortac
@vortac
A huge part for me is the emotional and tactile or general sensual experience that adds to the cultural or intellectual experience and that is often very different from person to person. It can only be emulated or simulated by an AI.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction