July
@july
I’ve often thought of crypto as money not meant to be used by humans (for the majority of use cases), but rather to be used by much more by and for machines
7 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions
Hal
@beyondprice
Agree that the machines should use block chain for efficiency of transfer. But I do think humans should be using a new form of value. Maybe you just mean it shouldn't feel complicated? I totally agree there. My point though is we should be denominating value in a scare assets that's value comes from supply and demand.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Keller
@dak
Yeah I felt like this was crypto’s telos ever since I read accelerando a decade+ ago
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
One of the issues that it can solve is payments between gateways. This is huge as everything is done instantly and not after s month and then companies adjusting pennies to get everything right.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sean
@alphonse86
Machines and maybe the not so normal tech savvy human that knows when it’s appropriately worth it to use crypto instead of fiat money.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Kenney 💜
@dankenney.eth
Yeah could imagine self driving cars running flash auctions for gray zone situations like lane changes or passing; could also support on the go recharging or local knowledge transfer
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sean
@swabbie.eth
not just money though. crypto will enable a new world of AI ownership.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Erick
@erickpinos
Oh for sure Part of what excited me the most about blockchain in 2016 was programmable money, and the concepts of a machine readable web, of which payments is a huge part. This was actually Web 3.0 before crypto popularized the term
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
