Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/speculation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

greyseymour.eth pfp
greyseymour.eth
@greyseymour
Farcaster will have to implement some form of mass spam reduction functionality by EOQ, & the limits of permissionlessness will be tested.
3 replies
0 recast
30 reactions

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
Warpcast will. Farcaster doesn’t need to imo.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Catherine Sullivan pfp
Catherine Sullivan
@catherine
It’d be hard to get companies to build Farcaster clients if there isn’t some support at the protocol level
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction